Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1899 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 68/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4400); the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,758,268 vs 2,456,969); the Vivo iQOO 15 is noticeably lighter (215g vs 239g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6

Performance 83
Display 78
Camera 65
Battery 39
Portability 52
Value for money 44

Vivo iQOO 15

Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 86

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 better?


  • Better portability (52/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3758268 vs 2456969
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2203
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6511
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 215g vs 239g
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1899

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 65/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 18 points higher (86/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 — 44/100, Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (94/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (78/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (85/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and the Vivo iQOO 15 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2456969 3758268
Geekbench Single 2203 3013
Geekbench Multi 6511 9287
Display 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2160x1856 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 130 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 153.5×132.6×5.6 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 239 g 215 g
Launch price $1899 $599

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
65
camera

Vivo iQOO 15

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6

  • 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1856
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Vivo iQOO 15

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
68/100
2456969 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +34.6%
3758268 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 by 34.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6

$1899

Vivo iQOO 15

$599

Launch price difference: $1300. Vivo iQOO 15 was $1300 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (94/100 vs 83/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (99/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (78/100 vs 65/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (85/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and the Vivo iQOO 15 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 65/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 83/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.