Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 65/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo has the bigger battery (7620 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 2,052,566); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 8.1mm).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide edges out the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

Performance 98
Display 80
Camera 50
Battery 52
Portability 74
Value for money —

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

Performance 76
Display 94
Camera 32
Battery 71
Portability 51
Value for money 80

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 2052566
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1579
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6100
  • Lighter: 201g vs 212g

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (50/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better portability (74/100 vs 51/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo better?

  • Bigger battery: 7620 vs 4800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Longer battery life (71/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 9 points higher (74/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads (71/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (98/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (50/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (71/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (74/100 vs 51/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo: The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8400
AnTuTu 3950082 2052566
Geekbench Single 3639 1579
Geekbench Multi 11047 6100
Display 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1828x2448 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4800 mAh 7620 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 17 / One UI 9 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 4400 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP65
Dimensions 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm
Weight 201 g 212 g
Launch price — $250

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
32
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1828x2448
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
52
battery

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

  • 7620 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
71
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
74/100
3950082 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo MediaTek Dimensity 8400
65/100 -92.4%
2052566 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo by 92.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

Price unknown

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo

$250

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (98/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (50/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (71/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (74/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide edges out the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.