Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
The Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400; launch prices were $799 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads — 74/100 vs 65/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo has the bigger battery (7620 mAh vs 4000); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is faster in AnTuTu (2,827,538 vs 2,052,566); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2827538 vs 2052566
- Better Geekbench Single: 2880 vs 1579
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9100 vs 6100
- Lighter: 162g vs 212g
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (77/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (89/100 vs 51/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo better?
- Bigger battery: 7620 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $799
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, the Samsung Galaxy S26 scores 9 points higher (74/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (89/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (77/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads (71/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 — 62/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (89/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (77/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (71/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (89/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2600 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | |
| AnTuTu | 2827538 | 2052566 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2880 | 1579 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9100 | 6100 | |
| Display | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7620 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 146 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 162 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | $250 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
- 7620 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 leads Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo by 37.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $549. Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo was $549 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (89/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (77/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (71/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (89/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 edges out the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on camera score (77/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on performance (89/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.