Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 65/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4400); the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,342,433); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special is thinner (4.9mm vs 8.2mm).
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2342433
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 7192
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 230g vs 236g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 83/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 51/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 78/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 26 points higher (91/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special (96/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special (85/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2342433 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2205 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7192 | 11033 | |
| Display | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2 | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1968x2184 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 157.9×142.6×4.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 236 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 4MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special by 44.9% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special (99/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special (96/100 vs 51/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special (85/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special by 26 points (91/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 51/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.