Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 44/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3300); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 859,084); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is noticeably lighter (183g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip by 43 points (87/100 vs 44/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Performance 55
Display 85
Camera 16
Battery 15
Portability 77
Value for money
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip better?
  • Lighter: 183g vs 226g

  • Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (77/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 859084
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1031
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2864
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3300 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 16/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 15/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 43 points higher (87/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (96/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (77/100 vs 43/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 859084 3269794
Geekbench Single 1031 3228
Geekbench Multi 2864 9553
Display 6.7" Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2636 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 3300 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 15W 90W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 10.0; One UI 2 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 167.3×73.6×7.2 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 183 g 226 g
Launch price $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
16
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
  • 6.7" Foldable Dynamic AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2636
  • Refresh rate: —
85
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
  • 3300 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
15
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+
44/100
859084 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +73.7%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip by 73.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Pro
$899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (93/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (96/100 vs 16/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (81/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (77/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip by 43 points (87/100 vs 44/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 16/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.