Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $849 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 59/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,841,283); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is noticeably lighter (187g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 187g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $849 vs $950
- Better portability (78/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1841283
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2085
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 6507
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 78/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 82/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 32 points higher (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE — 30/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (85/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1841283 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2085 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6507 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2640x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $849 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE by 56.6% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $101. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE was $101 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (99/100 vs 78/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (96/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (85/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (78/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE by 32 points (91/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.