Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs Vivo X300s

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $849 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 59/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 1,841,283); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is noticeably lighter (187g vs 217g).

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE by 30 points (89/100 vs 59/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
Performance 78
Display 82
Camera 35
Battery 31
Portability 78
Value for money 30
Vivo X300s
Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 90
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE better?
  • Lighter: 187g vs 217g

  • Better portability (78/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 1841283
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2085
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 6507
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $723 vs $849

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 30 points higher (89/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE — 30/100, Vivo X300s — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (94/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (83/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (78/100 vs 42/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE Vivo X300s
Processor Samsung Exynos 2400 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1841283 3703823
Geekbench Single 2085 3228
Geekbench Multi 6507 9553
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2640x1080 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm
Weight 187 g 217 g
Launch price $849 $723
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
35
camera
Vivo X300s
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
Vivo X300s
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
31
battery
Vivo X300s
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE Samsung Exynos 2400
59/100
1841283 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +50.3%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE by 50.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
$849
Vivo X300s
$723

Launch price difference: $126. Vivo X300s was $126 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (94/100 vs 78/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (94/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (83/100 vs 31/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (78/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE by 30 points (89/100 vs 59/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 78/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE over the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.