Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro (2020) runs on the Exynos 9611, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 30/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4050); the main camera is 25 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 355,351); the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro is noticeably lighter (179g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro better?
- Lighter: 179g vs 309g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 355351
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 365
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1107
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4050 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 25MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 21/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 23/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 39 points higher (69/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 23/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro (90/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro (52/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro (63/100 vs 23/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (56/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 9611 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 355351 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 365 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1107 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.3" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4050 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 25 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10.0; One UI 2 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 159.9×76.7×10.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro
- Main: 25MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro
- 6.3" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro
- 4050 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro by 87.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro (90/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 58/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro (52/100 vs 21/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro (63/100 vs 23/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (56/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro by 39 points (69/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 21/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.