Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (2022) runs on the Exynos 1280, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 38/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 25 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 613,957); the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 is thinner (10.1mm vs 12.9mm).
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Overall rating 38/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 613957
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 957
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2095
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 25MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 21/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 34/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 31 points higher (69/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (91/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (52/100 vs 21/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (63/100 vs 34/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1280 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 613957 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 957 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2095 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 25 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 169.5×81.1×10.1 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2
- Main: 25MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 by 79.0% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (91/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 57/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (52/100 vs 21/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 (63/100 vs 34/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 by 31 points (69/100 vs 38/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 21/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.