Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy S9 (2018) runs on the Samsung Exynos 9810, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $720 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 32/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 594,285); the Samsung Galaxy S9 is noticeably lighter (163g vs 207g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S9
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Samsung Galaxy S9 better?
- Lighter: 163g vs 207g
- Better portability (76/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 594285
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 744
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1863
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $650 vs $720
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S9 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 52 points higher (84/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S9 — 0/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (99/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (73/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S9 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (76/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S9 | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 9810 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 594285 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 744 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1863 | 9287 | |
| Display | 5.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.1×73.8×8.5 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 163 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $720 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S9
- Main: 12MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S9
- 5.8" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S9
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S9 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy S9 by 81.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $70. Vivo iQOO 13 was $70 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (91/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (99/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (78/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (73/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S9 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (76/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S9 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 by 52 points (84/100 vs 32/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S9 and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S9 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S9 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S9 over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.