Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Vivo X300s

The Samsung Galaxy S9 (2018) runs on the Samsung Exynos 9810, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $720 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 33/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 583,956); the Samsung Galaxy S9 is noticeably lighter (163g vs 217g).

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 by 56 points (89/100 vs 33/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S9
Performance 44
Display 51
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 76
Value for money 0
Vivo X300s
Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 90
What makes Samsung Galaxy S9 better?
  • Lighter: 163g vs 217g
  • Cheaper at launch: $720 vs $723

  • Better portability (76/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 583956
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 769
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2000
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 3000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S9 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 56 points higher (89/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S9 — 0/100, Vivo X300s — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (94/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (83/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S9 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (76/100 vs 42/100).

Samsung Galaxy S9: The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S9 Vivo X300s
Processor Samsung Exynos 9810 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 583956 3703823
Geekbench Single 769 3228
Geekbench Multi 2000 9553
Display 5.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1260
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3000 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 90W
Wireless charging 40W
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 50 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / OriginOS 6
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 158.1×73.8×8.5 mm
Weight 163 g 217 g
Launch price $720 $723
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S9
  • Main: 12MP
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera
Vivo X300s
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S9
  • 5.8" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
51
display
Vivo X300s
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S9
  • 3000 mAh
  • Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
15
battery
Vivo X300s
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S9 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810
33/100
583956 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +84.2%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy S9 by 84.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S9
$720
Vivo X300s
$723

Launch price difference: $3. Samsung Galaxy S9 was $3 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (94/100 vs 44/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (94/100 vs 51/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (94/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (83/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S9 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (76/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S9 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 by 56 points (89/100 vs 33/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S9 and the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S9 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S9 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 44/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S9 over the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.