Samsung Galaxy S9+ vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ (2018) runs on the Samsung Exynos 9810, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $840 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 36/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3500); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 583,956); the Samsung Galaxy S9+ is noticeably lighter (189g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy S9+
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 189g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $840 vs $950
- Better portability (60/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 583956
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 769
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2000
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 10W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 15/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 19/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S9+ vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 55 points higher (91/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 19/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S9+ — 0/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (96/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (85/100 vs 19/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S9+ notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (60/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S9+ | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 9810 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 583956 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 769 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2000 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.2" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2960x1440 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 10W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 8.0 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 158.1×73.8×8.5 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $840 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy S9+
- Main: 12MP f/1.5
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S9+
- 6.2" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2960x1440
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S9+
- 3500 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 10W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S9+ and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S9+ by 86.3% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $110. Samsung Galaxy S9+ was $110 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (99/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (89/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (96/100 vs 15/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (85/100 vs 19/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S9+ notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (60/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S9+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ by 55 points (91/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S9+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S9+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 15/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S9+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S9+ over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.