Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Vivo X Fold
The Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Vivo X Fold (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads — 74/100 vs 62/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold has the bigger battery (4600 mAh vs 4000); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is faster in AnTuTu (2,827,538 vs 1,294,871); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 311g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26
Vivo X Fold
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2827538 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 2880 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9100 vs 4188
- Lighter: 162g vs 311g
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (77/100 vs 55/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 77/100)
- Better portability (89/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold better?
- Bigger battery: 4600 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 25W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Longer battery life (59/100 vs 31/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 vs the Vivo X Fold, the Samsung Galaxy S26 scores 12 points higher (74/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (89/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (77/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold leads (59/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold (89/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Vivo X Fold are nearly equal (81/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold (77/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (59/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Vivo X Fold (89/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 | Vivo X Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 2827538 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2880 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9100 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1916x2160 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 66W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 146 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 48 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | 162.0×74.5×14.6 mm | |
| Weight | 162 g | 311 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1916x2160
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X Fold
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 and Vivo X Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 leads Vivo X Fold by 118.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold (89/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Vivo X Fold are nearly equal (81/100 vs 77/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold (77/100 vs 55/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (59/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Vivo X Fold (89/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo X Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably better than the Vivo X Fold — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Vivo X Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo X Fold — 62/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo X Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on camera score (77/100 vs 55/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Vivo X Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on performance (89/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 over the Vivo X Fold?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X Fold is a better fit for active users.