Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 50
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 50 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate; launch prices were $1299 and $180. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 52/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Tecno Camon 50
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 2100
- Faster charging: 60W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 39/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 40/100)
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 201g vs 214g
- Cheaper at launch: $180 vs $1299
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 61/100)
- Better display (92/100 vs 88/100)
- Better portability (58/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Tecno Camon 50, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 32 points higher (84/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 40/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 76/100, Tecno Camon 50 — 72/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (86/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (64/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Tecno Camon 50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 3515964 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3601 | 750 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10686 | 2100 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 33W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 214 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | $180 |
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Tecno Camon 50
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Tecno Camon 50
- 6150 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- Wireless charging: no data
Launch price difference: $1119. Tecno Camon 50 was $1119 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (96/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 (86/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 50 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (64/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 50?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 by 32 points (84/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 50?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Tecno Camon 50 — 52/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 50?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 50?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Tecno Camon 50?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Camon 50 is a better fit for everyday use.