Poco M5 vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

The Poco M5 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $170 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 41/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 552,286); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is thinner (7.9mm vs 8.9mm).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M5 by 43 points (84/100 vs 41/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco M5
Performance 43
Display 54
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 49
Value for money 52
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Performance 96
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 76
What makes Poco M5 better?
  • Lighter: 201g vs 214g
  • Cheaper at launch: $170 vs $1299

  • Overall rating 41/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 552286
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 2047
  • Faster charging: 60W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better portability (51/100 vs 49/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco M5 vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 43 points higher (84/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Poco M5 — 52/100, Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 76/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M5 (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M5 (88/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M5 (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco M5 (61/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Poco M5 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 49/100).

Poco M5: The Poco M5 is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco M5 Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 552286 3515964
Geekbench Single 727 3601
Geekbench Multi 2047 10686
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2408x1080 3120x1440
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 60W
Wireless charging 0W 25W
DXOMark (camera) 157
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 5 MP 12 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 500 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 164.0×76.1×8.9 mm 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm
Weight 201 g 214 g
Launch price $170 $1299
Camera comparison
Poco M5
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 5MP
30
camera
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera
Display comparison
Poco M5
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 2408x1080
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
54
display
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
Battery and charging
Poco M5
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco M5 and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco M5 MediaTek Helio G99
41/100
552286 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +84.3%
3515964 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Poco M5 by 84.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco M5
$170
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
$1299

Launch price difference: $1129. Poco M5 was $1129 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M5 (96/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M5 (88/100 vs 54/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M5 (86/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco M5 (61/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Poco M5 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 49/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco M5 or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco M5 by 43 points (84/100 vs 41/100).

What is the rating of the Poco M5 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Poco M5 has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco M5 or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco M5 or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Poco M5 over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Poco M5 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.