Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888; launch prices were $1299 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 48/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 200 MP vs 12 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 1,119,714); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably lighter (214g vs 271g).
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 1119714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 1488
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 3373
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 60W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 10W
- Lighter: 214g vs 271g
- Cheaper at launch: $1299 vs $1799
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 63/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 20/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 38/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 20/100)
- Overall rating 48/100
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 36 points higher (84/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 38/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 76/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 — 0/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (86/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (61/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (51/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | |
| AnTuTu | 3515964 | 1119714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3601 | 1488 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10686 | 3373 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 2208x1768 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 10W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 12 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 214 g | 271 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | $1799 |
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- Main: 12MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2208x1768
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 10W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 214.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra was $500 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (96/100 vs 63/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (86/100 vs 20/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (61/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 (51/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 by 36 points (84/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 20/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 63/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 is a better fit for active users.