Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo T5x

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo T5x (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo; launch prices were $1299 and $225. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 53/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo T5x has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,463,142 vs 953,150); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo T5x doesn't.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo T5x by 31 points (84/100 vs 53/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Performance 96
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 78

Vivo T5x

Performance 57
Display 65
Camera 37
Battery 60
Portability 43
Value for money 62

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3463142 vs 953150
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 3185
  • Faster charging: 60W vs 44W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 214g vs 219g

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 65/100)
  • Better portability (51/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo T5x better?

  • Bigger battery: 7200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Cheaper at launch: $225 vs $1299

  • Overall rating 53/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Vivo T5x, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 31 points higher (84/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 78/100, Vivo T5x — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo T5x (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo T5x (88/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo T5x (86/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo T5x are nearly equal (61/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Vivo T5x
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo
AnTuTu 3463142 953150
Geekbench Single 3601 1061
Geekbench Multi 10686 3185
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" IPS LCD
Resolution 3120x1440 1080x2344
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7200 mAh
Charging 60W 44W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 157 —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 6GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 16, OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 1200 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm 166.6×78.4×8.4 mm
Weight 214 g 219 g
Launch price $1299 $225

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera

Vivo T5x

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 32MP
37
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Vivo T5x

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
65
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Vivo T5x

  • 7200 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
60
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Vivo T5x, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100
3463142 AnTuTu
Vivo T5x MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo
53/100 -263.3%
953150 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Vivo T5x by 263.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

$1299

Vivo T5x

$225

Launch price difference: $1074. Vivo T5x was $1074 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo T5x (96/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo T5x (88/100 vs 65/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo T5x (86/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo T5x are nearly equal (61/100 vs 60/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo T5x?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo T5x by 31 points (84/100 vs 53/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo T5x?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Vivo T5x — 53/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo T5x?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo T5x?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Vivo T5x?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.