Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 40

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Spark 40 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81; launch prices were $1299 and $120. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 39/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark 40 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,128,552 vs 358,608); the Tecno Spark 40 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 218g).

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 by 41 points (80/100 vs 39/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

Performance 92
Display 88
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 46
Value for money 70

Tecno Spark 40

Performance 30
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 53
Portability 68
Value for money 60

What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3128552 vs 358608
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 1416
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better camera (81/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 55/100)

What makes Tecno Spark 40 better?

  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 192g vs 218g
  • Cheaper at launch: $120 vs $1299

  • Better portability (68/100 vs 46/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs the Tecno Spark 40, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 41 points higher (80/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 30/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 70/100, Tecno Spark 40 — 60/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (92/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (88/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (81/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Tecno Spark 40 are nearly equal (56/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (68/100 vs 46/100).

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Tecno Spark 40
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Helio G81
AnTuTu 3128552 358608
Geekbench Single 3100 432
Geekbench Multi 9760 1416
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 3120x1440 1600x720
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
Charging 45W 45W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 151 —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 8 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 4GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 / One UI 7 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP64
Dimensions 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm 165.6×77.0×7.7 mm
Weight 218 g 192 g
Launch price $1299 $120

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
81
camera

Tecno Spark 40

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Tecno Spark 40

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery

Tecno Spark 40

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Tecno Spark 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
80/100
3128552 AnTuTu
Tecno Spark 40 MediaTek Helio G81
39/100 -772.4%
358608 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Tecno Spark 40 by 772.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

$1299

Tecno Spark 40

$120

Launch price difference: $1179. Tecno Spark 40 was $1179 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (92/100 vs 30/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (88/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (81/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Tecno Spark 40 are nearly equal (56/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (68/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Tecno Spark 40?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 by 41 points (80/100 vs 39/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Tecno Spark 40?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Tecno Spark 40 — 39/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Tecno Spark 40?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Tecno Spark 40?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 30/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra over the Tecno Spark 40?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.