Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Tecno Spark 40

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Spark 40 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81; launch prices were $2199 and $120. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads — 78/100 vs 39/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark 40 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,453,998 vs 358,608); the Tecno Spark 40 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 by 39 points (78/100 vs 39/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

Performance 96
Display 78
Camera 67
Battery 61
Portability 66
Value for money 64

Tecno Spark 40

Performance 30
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 53
Portability 68
Value for money 60

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3453998 vs 358608
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1416
  • Faster charging: 60W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better camera (67/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (78/100 vs 55/100)

What makes Tecno Spark 40 better?

  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 192g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $120 vs $2199

  • Better portability (68/100 vs 66/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs the Tecno Spark 40, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 39 points higher (78/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (67/100 vs 30/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 64/100, Tecno Spark 40 — 60/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (78/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (67/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Tecno Spark 40
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Helio G81
AnTuTu 3453998 358608
Geekbench Single 3639 432
Geekbench Multi 11047 1416
Display 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 1968x2184 1600x720
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
Charging 60W 45W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 8 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 4GB / 8GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 15
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP64
Dimensions — 165.6×77.0×7.7 mm
Weight 215 g 192 g
Launch price $2199 $120

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
67
camera

Tecno Spark 40

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1968x2184
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Tecno Spark 40

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Tecno Spark 40

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and Tecno Spark 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
78/100
3453998 AnTuTu
Tecno Spark 40 MediaTek Helio G81
39/100 -863.2%
358608 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads Tecno Spark 40 by 863.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

$2199

Tecno Spark 40

$120

Launch price difference: $2079. Tecno Spark 40 was $2079 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (96/100 vs 30/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (78/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 (67/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Tecno Spark 40?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 by 39 points (78/100 vs 39/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Tecno Spark 40?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Tecno Spark 40 — 39/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Tecno Spark 40?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on camera score (67/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Tecno Spark 40?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 30/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra over the Tecno Spark 40?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.