Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs Vivo Y500
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) and the Vivo Y500 (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 36/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y500 doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Vivo Y500
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 34/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs the Vivo Y500, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 1 points higher (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 leads (61/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y500 leads (86/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (81/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (61/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y500 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (86/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | Vivo Y500 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc T7300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 8100 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 44W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.7×76.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 210 g | |
| Price | — | $345 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo Y500
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y500
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y500
- 8100 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (81/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (61/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a bit better (50/100 vs 37/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y500 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (86/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Vivo Y500?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Vivo Y500 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the Vivo Y500?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo Y500 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Vivo Y500?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 34/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim over the Vivo Y500?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo Y500 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.