Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs Vivo Y32t
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) and the Vivo Y32t (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 11/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 26 points higher (37/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (76/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | — | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (81/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (76/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 26 points (37/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.