Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 28/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,128,552 vs 303,398); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 218g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Vivo Y32t
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3128552 vs 303398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 341
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 779
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 20/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Lighter: 179g vs 218g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs the Vivo Y32t, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 52 points higher (80/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 20/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (92/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (88/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (81/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (68/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 3128552 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3100 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9760 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 151 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / One UI 7 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 218 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Vivo Y32t by 931.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (92/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (88/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (81/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (68/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 52 points (80/100 vs 28/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 20/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.