Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) and the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 31/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China), the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 6 points higher (37/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) leads (39/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (81/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (39/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 80W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 650 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.0×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | — | 194 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) (81/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (39/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) — 31/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 34/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim over the Vivo iQOO Z6 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO Z6 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.