Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 31/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 6 points higher (37/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (81/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) are nearly equal (50/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 44W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 203 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (81/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (51/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) are nearly equal (50/100 vs 46/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 31/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use.