Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 51/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,463,142 vs 954,090); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is thinner (7.9mm vs 9.2mm).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) by 33 points (84/100 vs 51/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Performance 96
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 78

Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)

Performance 58
Display 66
Camera 32
Battery 56
Portability 44
Value for money —

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3463142 vs 954090
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 1114
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 3281
  • Faster charging: 60W vs 44W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 32/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (51/100 vs 44/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) better?

  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 203g vs 214g

  • Overall rating 51/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 33 points higher (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (88/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (86/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 1300
AnTuTu 3463142 954090
Geekbench Single 3601 1114
Geekbench Multi 10686 3281
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 3120x1440 1080x2408
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 60W 44W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 157 —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 6GB / 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 12, Funtouch 12
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits —
NFC yes no
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm
Weight 214 g 203 g
Launch price $1299 —

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera

Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
32
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2408
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100
3463142 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) MediaTek Dimensity 1300
51/100 -263.0%
954090 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) by 263.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

$1299

Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (96/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (88/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (86/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) by 33 points (84/100 vs 51/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 51/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.