Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs Vivo X90 Pro
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) and the Vivo X90 Pro (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 33/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 3 MP.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Vivo X90 Pro
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 3MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 34/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs the Vivo X90 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 4 points higher (37/100 vs 33/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X90 Pro leads (58/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X90 Pro (81/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X90 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (58/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim notably outperforms the Vivo X90 Pro (50/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | Vivo X90 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 4870 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 3 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.1×74.5×9.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 214 g | |
| Price | — | $799 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X90 Pro
- Main: 3MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X90 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Vivo X90 Pro
- 4870 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X90 Pro (81/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X90 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (58/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim notably outperforms the Vivo X90 Pro (50/100 vs 32/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim edges out the Vivo X90 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo X90 Pro — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 34/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim over the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X90 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.