Samsung Galaxy S24 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy S24 (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $799 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 61/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,820,628); the Samsung Galaxy S24 is noticeably lighter (167g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S24
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy S24 better?
- Lighter: 167g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $950
- Better portability (82/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1820628
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2115
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6826
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 78/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S24 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 30 points higher (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S24 — 36/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (99/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (85/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (82/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S24 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1820628 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2115 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6826 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.2" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 158.5×75.9×7.7 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 167 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S24
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S24
- 6.2" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S24
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S24 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S24 by 57.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $151. Samsung Galaxy S24 was $151 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (99/100 vs 78/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (85/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (82/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S24 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 by 30 points (91/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S24 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S24 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S24 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S24 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S24 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.