Samsung Galaxy S24 vs Vivo iQOO 15T

The Samsung Galaxy S24 (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $799 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 61/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T is faster in AnTuTu (4,704,310 vs 1,820,628); the Samsung Galaxy S24 is noticeably lighter (167g vs 216g).

The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 by 21 points (82/100 vs 61/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S24

Performance 78
Display 81
Camera 40
Battery 31
Portability 82
Value for money 36

Vivo iQOO 15T

Performance 97
Display 99
Camera 65
Battery 75
Portability 44
Value for money 86

What makes Samsung Galaxy S24 better?

  • Lighter: 167g vs 216g

  • Better portability (82/100 vs 44/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4704310 vs 1820628
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2115
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6826
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $799

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better camera (65/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (75/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S24 vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 21 points higher (82/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (97/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (65/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S24 — 36/100, Vivo iQOO 15T — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (97/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (65/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (75/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (82/100 vs 44/100).

Samsung Galaxy S24: The Samsung Galaxy S24 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 15T: The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S24 Vivo iQOO 15T
Processor Samsung Exynos 2400 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1820628 4704310
Geekbench Single 2115 3293
Geekbench Multi 6826 10243
Display 6.2" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 158.5×75.9×7.7 mm —
Weight 167 g 216 g
Launch price $799 $499

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S24

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
40
camera

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
65
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S24

  • 6.2" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S24

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
31
battery

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
75
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S24 and Vivo iQOO 15T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400
61/100
1820628 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15T MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +61.3%
4704310 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15T leads Samsung Galaxy S24 by 61.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S24

$799

Vivo iQOO 15T

$499

Launch price difference: $300. Vivo iQOO 15T was $300 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (97/100 vs 78/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (99/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (65/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 (75/100 vs 31/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (82/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S24 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 by 21 points (82/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S24 and the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Samsung Galaxy S24 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S24 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on camera score (65/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S24 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on performance (97/100 vs 78/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 over the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Samsung Galaxy S24 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.