Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400e, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $649 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 67/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,849,346); the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is noticeably lighter (213g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Samsung Galaxy S24 FE better?
- Lighter: 213g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $649 vs $2899
- Better camera (67/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1849346
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1850
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5500
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 2 points higher (69/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE leads (67/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE — 48/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (67/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2400e | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1849346 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1850 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5500 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 133 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1900 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.0×77.3×8.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 213 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $649 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by 36.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2250. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE was $2250 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (67/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE (63/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE leads on camera score (67/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.