Samsung Galaxy S23 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy S23 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $799 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 66/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 3900); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,656,761); the Samsung Galaxy S23 is noticeably lighter (168g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S23
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Samsung Galaxy S23 better?
- Lighter: 168g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $2899
- Better camera (67/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (83/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1656761
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 3900 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 75/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 29/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S23 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 3 points higher (69/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 leads (67/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 29/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S23 — 46/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (67/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 (63/100 vs 29/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (83/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S23 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1656761 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.1" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3900 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 133 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1750 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 157.8×76.2×7.6 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 168 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S23
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S23
- 6.1" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S23
- 3900 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S23 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy S23 by 43.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2100. Samsung Galaxy S23 was $2100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 (90/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (67/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S23 (63/100 vs 29/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S23 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (83/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S23 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Samsung Galaxy S23 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S23 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S23 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S23 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S23 leads on camera score (67/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S23 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S23 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy S23 is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.