Samsung Galaxy S21+ vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S21+ (2021) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2100, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $999 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 57/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,017,773); the Samsung Galaxy S21+ is noticeably lighter (200g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ by 31 points (88/100 vs 57/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S21+

Performance 62
Display 79
Camera 42
Battery 48
Portability 60
Value for money 24

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Samsung Galaxy S21+ better?

  • Lighter: 200g vs 226g

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1017773
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1435
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3555
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $999

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 62/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S21+ vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 31 points higher (88/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 62/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S21+ — 24/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (94/100 vs 62/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (81/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S21+ notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).

Samsung Galaxy S21+: The Samsung Galaxy S21+ is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S21+ Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 2100 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1017773 3326259
Geekbench Single 1435 3293
Geekbench Multi 3555 10243
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4800 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 171
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 11 Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 4500 nits
NFC — yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions — 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 200 g 226 g
Launch price $999 $899

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S21+

  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 10MP
42
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S21+

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S21+

  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
48
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S21+ and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S21+ Samsung Exynos 2100
57/100
1017773 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +69.4%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S21+ by 69.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S21+

$999

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $100. Vivo X300 Pro was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (94/100 vs 62/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (96/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (81/100 vs 48/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S21+ notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S21+ or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ by 31 points (88/100 vs 57/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S21+ and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S21+ has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S21+ or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S21+ or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 62/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S21+ over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S21+ is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.