Samsung Galaxy S21+ vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Samsung Galaxy S21+ (2021) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2100, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $999 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 57/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 1,017,773).

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ by 27 points (84/100 vs 57/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S21+
Performance 62
Display 79
Camera 42
Battery 48
Portability 60
Value for money 26
Vivo iQOO 13
Performance 92
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy S21+ better?
  • Lighter: 200g vs 207g

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 1017773
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1435
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3555
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $650 vs $999

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 62/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better value for money (80/100 vs 26/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S21+ vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 27 points higher (84/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 62/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (80/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (92/100 vs 62/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (73/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S21+ is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (80/100 vs 26/100).

Samsung Galaxy S21+: The Samsung Galaxy S21+ is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S21+ Vivo iQOO 13
Processor Samsung Exynos 2100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1017773 3119308
Geekbench Single 1435 3041
Geekbench Multi 3555 9494
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2400x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4800 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 25W 120W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 11 Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 200 g 207 g
Launch price $999 $650
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S21+
  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 10MP
42
camera
Vivo iQOO 13
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S21+
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S21+
  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
48
battery
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S21+ and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S21+ Samsung Exynos 2100
57/100
1017773 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100 +67.4%
3119308 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy S21+ by 67.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S21+
$999
Vivo iQOO 13
$650

Launch price difference: $349. Vivo iQOO 13 was $349 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (92/100 vs 62/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (99/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (78/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (73/100 vs 48/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S21+ is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ (80/100 vs 26/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S21+ or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S21+ by 27 points (84/100 vs 57/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S21+ and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy S21+ has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S21+ or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S21+ or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 62/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S21+ over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy S21+ is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.