Samsung Galaxy S20 vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy S20 (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $999 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 47/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 888,046); the Samsung Galaxy S20 is noticeably lighter (163g vs 229g).
Samsung Galaxy S20
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Lighter: 163g vs 229g
- Better portability (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 888046
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 3060
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
- Cheaper at launch: $889 vs $999
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 57/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 11/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S20 vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 39 points higher (86/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 11/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 32/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S20 — 6/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 (92/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S20 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 (93/100 vs 11/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (96/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S20 | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 888046 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1222 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3060 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.2" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 163 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $999 | $889 |
Samsung Galaxy S20
- Main: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S20
- 6.2" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S20
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S20 and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S20 by 71.3% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $110. Vivo X200 Ultra was $110 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 (92/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S20 are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 (93/100 vs 11/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 (78/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S20 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 by 39 points (86/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S20 and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S20 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 11/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S20 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S20 over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.