Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S20+ (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1199 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 56/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 874,382); the Samsung Galaxy S20+ is noticeably lighter (188g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ by 31 points (87/100 vs 56/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Performance 57
Display 90
Camera 42
Battery 42
Portability 72
Value for money 22
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy S20+ better?
  • Lighter: 188g vs 226g

  • Better display (90/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (72/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 874382
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1222
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3060
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 31 points higher (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S20+ — 22/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ (93/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20+ is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ (96/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ (81/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20+ notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (72/100 vs 43/100).

Samsung Galaxy S20+: The Samsung Galaxy S20+ is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S20+ Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 990 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 874382 3269794
Geekbench Single 1222 3228
Geekbench Multi 3060 9553
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 3200x1440 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 10 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 188 g 226 g
Launch price $1199 $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S20+
  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 10MP
42
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S20+
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S20+
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
42
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S20+ and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990
56/100
874382 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +73.3%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S20+ by 73.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S20+
$1199
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $300. Vivo X300 Pro was $300 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ (93/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20+ is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ (96/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ (81/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20+ notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (72/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S20+ or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ by 31 points (87/100 vs 56/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S20+ and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S20+ has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S20+ or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S20+ or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S20+ over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S20+ is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.