Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Samsung Galaxy S20+ (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1199 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 56/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 874,382); the Samsung Galaxy S20+ is noticeably lighter (188g vs 215g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ by 30 points (86/100 vs 56/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Performance 57
Display 90
Camera 42
Battery 42
Portability 72
Value for money 22
Vivo iQOO 15
Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 84
What makes Samsung Galaxy S20+ better?
  • Lighter: 188g vs 215g

  • Better portability (72/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 874382
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1222
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3060
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 42/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 90/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 30 points higher (86/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S20+ — 22/100, Vivo iQOO 15 — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ (94/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ (78/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ (85/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20+ notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (72/100 vs 48/100).

Samsung Galaxy S20+: The Samsung Galaxy S20+ is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S20+ Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Samsung Exynos 990 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 874382 3740528
Geekbench Single 1222 3041
Geekbench Multi 3060 9494
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 3200x1440 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 10 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 6000 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 188 g 215 g
Launch price $1199 $599
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S20+
  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 10MP
42
camera
Vivo iQOO 15
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S20+
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S20+
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
42
battery
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S20+ and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990
56/100
874382 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +76.6%
3740528 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy S20+ by 76.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S20+
$1199
Vivo iQOO 15
$599

Launch price difference: $600. Vivo iQOO 15 was $600 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ (94/100 vs 57/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ (78/100 vs 42/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ (85/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20+ notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (72/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S20+ or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20+ by 30 points (86/100 vs 56/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S20+ and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy S20+ has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S20+ or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 42/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S20+ or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S20+ over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy S20+ is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.