Samsung Galaxy S10e vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Samsung Galaxy S10e (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 9820, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $749 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 40/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3100); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,714,661 vs 745,471); the Samsung Galaxy S10e is noticeably lighter (150g vs 215g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e by 46 points (86/100 vs 40/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Performance 51
Display 59
Camera 17
Battery 20
Portability 84
Value for money 0
Vivo iQOO 15
Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 84
What makes Samsung Galaxy S10e better?
  • Lighter: 150g vs 215g

  • Better portability (84/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3714661 vs 745471
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1001
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2322
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3100 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $749

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 17/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 20/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 59/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S10e vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 46 points higher (86/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 20/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S10e — 0/100, Vivo iQOO 15 — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (94/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (78/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (85/100 vs 20/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S10e significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (84/100 vs 48/100).

Samsung Galaxy S10e: The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S10e Vivo iQOO 15
Processor Samsung Exynos 9820 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 745471 3714661
Geekbench Single 1001 3041
Geekbench Multi 2322 9494
Display 5.8" Dynamic AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2280x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3100 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 15W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 16 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 142.2×69.9×7.9 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 150 g 215 g
Launch price $749 $599
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S10e
  • Main: 12MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 16MP
  • Front: 10MP
17
camera
Vivo iQOO 15
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S10e
  • 5.8" Dynamic AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2280x1080
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
59
display
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S10e
  • 3100 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • Wireless: 15W
20
battery
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S10e and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820
40/100
745471 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +79.9%
3714661 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy S10e by 79.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S10e
$749
Vivo iQOO 15
$599

Launch price difference: $150. Vivo iQOO 15 was $150 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (94/100 vs 51/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (99/100 vs 59/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (78/100 vs 17/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (85/100 vs 20/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S10e significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 (84/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S10e or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e by 46 points (86/100 vs 40/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S10e and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S10e or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 17/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S10e or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 51/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S10e over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.