Samsung Galaxy S10e vs Vivo X500 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S10e (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 9820, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro; launch prices were $749 and $970. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 40/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3100); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 744,321); the Samsung Galaxy S10e is noticeably lighter (150g vs 192g).

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e by 50 points (90/100 vs 40/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S10e

Performance 52
Display 59
Camera 17
Battery 20
Portability 84
Value for money 0

Vivo X500 Pro

Performance 100
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 81
Portability 63
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy S10e better?

  • Lighter: 150g vs 192g
  • Cheaper at launch: $749 vs $970

  • Better portability (84/100 vs 63/100)

What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 744321
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 1008
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 2710
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3100 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 17/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 20/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 59/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S10e vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 50 points higher (90/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 20/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S10e — 0/100, Vivo X500 Pro — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (100/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (94/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (87/100 vs 17/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (81/100 vs 20/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S10e notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (84/100 vs 63/100).

Vivo X500 Pro: The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S10e Vivo X500 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 9820 MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
AnTuTu 744321 5016623
Geekbench Single 1008 4188
Geekbench Multi 2710 13145
Display 5.8" Dynamic AMOLED 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2280x1080 1216x2660
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3100 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 15W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 16 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9 Android 17
Brightness (peak) — 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 142.2×69.9×7.9 mm 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm
Weight 150 g 192 g
Launch price $749 $970

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S10e

  • Main: 12MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 16MP
  • Front: 10MP
17
camera

Vivo X500 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S10e

  • 5.8" Dynamic AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2280x1080
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
59
display

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2660
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S10e

  • 3100 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • Wireless: 15W
20
battery

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S10e and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820
40/100
744321 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
90/100 +85.2%
5016623 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S10e by 85.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S10e

$749

Vivo X500 Pro

$970

Launch price difference: $221. Samsung Galaxy S10e was $221 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (100/100 vs 52/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (94/100 vs 59/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (87/100 vs 17/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e (81/100 vs 20/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S10e notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (84/100 vs 63/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S10e or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10e by 50 points (90/100 vs 40/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S10e and the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S10e or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 17/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S10e or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 52/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S10e over the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.