Samsung Galaxy S10 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S10 (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 9820, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $899 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 42/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3400); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 745,471); the Samsung Galaxy S10 is noticeably lighter (157g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 by 45 points (87/100 vs 42/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S10
Performance 51
Display 66
Camera 22
Battery 19
Portability 85
Value for money 0
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy S10 better?
  • Lighter: 157g vs 226g

  • Better portability (85/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 745471
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1001
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2322
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 9W

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 22/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 19/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S10 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 45 points higher (87/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 19/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S10 — 0/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (93/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (96/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (81/100 vs 19/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S10 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (85/100 vs 43/100).

Samsung Galaxy S10: The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S10 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 9820 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 745471 3269794
Geekbench Single 1001 3228
Geekbench Multi 2322 9553
Display 6.1" Dynamic AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 3040x1440 1260x2800
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3400 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 15W 90W
Wireless charging 9W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 16 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 157.6×74.1×7.8 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 157 g 226 g
Launch price $899 $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S10
  • Main: 12MP f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 16MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
22
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S10
  • 6.1" Dynamic AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3040x1440
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
66
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S10
  • 3400 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • Wireless: 9W
19
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S10 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820
42/100
745471 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +77.2%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S10 by 77.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S10
$899
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $0. Same launch price.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (93/100 vs 51/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (84/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (96/100 vs 22/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (81/100 vs 19/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S10 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (85/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S10 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 by 45 points (87/100 vs 42/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S10 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S10 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 22/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S10 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 51/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S10 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.