Samsung Galaxy S10 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy S10 (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 9820, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $899 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 42/100 (a 49-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3400); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 745,471); the Samsung Galaxy S10 is noticeably lighter (157g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy S10
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 157g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $950
- Better portability (85/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 745471
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1001
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2322
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3400 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 9W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 22/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 19/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S10 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 49 points higher (91/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 19/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S10 — 0/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (99/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (96/100 vs 22/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (85/100 vs 19/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S10 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (85/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S10 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 9820 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 745471 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1001 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2322 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.1" Dynamic AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 3040x1440 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3400 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 9W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 9 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 157.6×74.1×7.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 157 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy S10
- Main: 12MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 16MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S10
- 6.1" Dynamic AMOLED
- Resolution: 3040x1440
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S10
- 3400 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 9W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy S10 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S10 by 82.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $51. Samsung Galaxy S10 was $51 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (99/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (89/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (96/100 vs 22/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 (85/100 vs 19/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S10 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (85/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S10 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10 by 49 points (91/100 vs 42/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S10 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S10 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 22/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S10 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S10 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.