Samsung Galaxy S10+ vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S10+ (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 9820, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $999 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 40/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4100); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 745,471); the Samsung Galaxy S10+ is noticeably lighter (175g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ by 47 points (87/100 vs 40/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S10+
Performance 51
Display 51
Camera 16
Battery 36
Portability 76
Value for money 0
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy S10+ better?
  • Lighter: 175g vs 226g

  • Better portability (76/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 745471
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1001
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2322
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4100 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 9W
  • Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $999

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 16/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 36/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S10+ vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 47 points higher (87/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 36/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S10+ — 0/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (93/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (96/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (81/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S10+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (76/100 vs 43/100).

Samsung Galaxy S10+: The Samsung Galaxy S10+ is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S10+ Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 9820 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 745471 3269794
Geekbench Single 1001 3228
Geekbench Multi 2322 9553
Display 6.4" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4100 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 90W
Wireless charging 9W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 157.6×74.1×7.8 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 175 g 226 g
Launch price $999 $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S10+
  • Main: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
16
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S10+
  • 6.4" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
51
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S10+
  • 4100 mAh
  • Wireless: 9W
36
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S10+ and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S10+ Samsung Exynos 9820
40/100
745471 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +77.2%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S10+ by 77.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S10+
$999
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $100. Vivo X300 Pro was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (93/100 vs 51/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (84/100 vs 51/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (96/100 vs 16/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (81/100 vs 36/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S10+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (76/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S10+ or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ by 47 points (87/100 vs 40/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S10+ and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S10+ has a MobileRank rating of 40/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S10+ or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 16/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S10+ or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 51/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S10+ over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S10+ is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.