Samsung Galaxy S10+ vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy S10+ (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 9820, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $999 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 41/100 (a 48-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 4100); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 744,321); the Samsung Galaxy S10+ is noticeably lighter (175g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ by 48 points (89/100 vs 41/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S10+

Performance 52
Display 51
Camera 16
Battery 36
Portability 76
Value for money 0

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy S10+ better?

  • Lighter: 175g vs 227g

  • Better portability (76/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 744321
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1008
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2710
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 4100 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 9W
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $999

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 16/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 36/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 51/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S10+ vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 48 points higher (89/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 36/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S10+ — 0/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (99/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (99/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (78/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (92/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S10+ significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (76/100 vs 35/100).

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S10+ Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Samsung Exynos 9820 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 744321 4602290
Geekbench Single 1008 3639
Geekbench Multi 2710 11047
Display 6.4" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution — 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4100 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging — 120W
Wireless charging 9W 50W
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 128GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS — Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 157.6×74.1×7.8 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 175 g 227 g
Launch price $999 $799

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S10+

  • Main: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
16
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S10+

  • 6.4" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
51
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S10+

  • 4100 mAh
  • Wireless: 9W
36
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S10+ and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S10+ Samsung Exynos 9820
41/100
744321 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +83.8%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S10+ by 83.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S10+

$999

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $200. Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra was $200 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (99/100 vs 52/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (99/100 vs 51/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (78/100 vs 16/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ (92/100 vs 36/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S10+ significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (76/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S10+ or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S10+ by 48 points (89/100 vs 41/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S10+ and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S10+ has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S10+ or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 16/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S10+ or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 52/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S10+ over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.