Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 (2024) runs on the Exynos 1480, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 55/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,021,736); the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 is noticeably lighter (213g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 better?
- Lighter: 213g vs 309g
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (49/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1021736
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1137
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3437
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 42/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 14 points higher (69/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 (90/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 (63/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (49/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1480 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1021736 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1137 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3437 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.1×77.4×8.2 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 213 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 by 65.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 (90/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 (63/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (49/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 42/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Quantum 5 is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.