Samsung Galaxy M47 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy M47 5G (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $275 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 56/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 840,353).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M47 5G
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Samsung Galaxy M47 5G better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $275 vs $2899
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 840353
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3000
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 42/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 61/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 13 points higher (69/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy M47 5G — 56/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G are nearly equal (63/100 vs 61/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 840353 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1013 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3000 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | — | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $275 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M47 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M47 5G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M47 5G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M47 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy M47 5G by 71.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2624. Samsung Galaxy M47 5G was $2624 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G (90/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G are nearly equal (63/100 vs 61/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy M47 5G has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 42/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.