Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy M35 (2024) runs on the Exynos 1380, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 51/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 767,711); the Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 222g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M35
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Samsung Galaxy M35 better?
- Overall rating 51/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 767711
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1008
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2710
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 207g vs 222g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M35 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 33 points higher (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (91/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (73/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (55/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 767711 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1008 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2710 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, One UI 6.1 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×78.6×9.1 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 222 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | — | $650 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M35
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M35
- 6.6" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M35
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M35 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy M35 by 75.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M35
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (91/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (99/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (78/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (73/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (55/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 by 33 points (84/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M35 and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy M35 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M35 over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.