Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Vivo X300s

The Samsung Galaxy M35 (2024) runs on the Exynos 1380, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 51/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 768,212).

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 by 38 points (89/100 vs 51/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M35
Performance 53
Display 79
Camera 34
Battery 52
Portability 34
Value for money
Vivo X300s
Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 90
What makes Samsung Galaxy M35 better?

  • Overall rating 51/100
What makes Vivo X300s better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 768212
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1008
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2758
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 217g vs 222g

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (42/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M35 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 38 points higher (89/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (94/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (94/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (42/100 vs 34/100).

Samsung Galaxy M35: The Samsung Galaxy M35 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy M35 Vivo X300s
Processor Exynos 1380 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 768212 3703823
Geekbench Single 1008 3228
Geekbench Multi 2758 9553
Display 6.6" Super AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 50 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, One UI 6.1 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits
NFC yes
Dimensions 162.3×78.6×9.1 mm
Weight 222 g 217 g
Launch price $723
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M35
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera
Vivo X300s
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M35
  • 6.6" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Vivo X300s
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M35
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery
Vivo X300s
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy M35 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy M35 Exynos 1380
51/100
768212 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +79.3%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy M35 by 79.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M35
Price unknown
Vivo X300s
$723
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (94/100 vs 53/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (94/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (94/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 (83/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (42/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M35 by 38 points (89/100 vs 51/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M35 and the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy M35 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M35 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 53/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M35 over the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy M35 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.