Samsung Galaxy M17 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $130 and $834. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 48/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 607,137); the Samsung Galaxy M17 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy M17
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 192g vs 226g
- Cheaper: $130 vs $834
- Better portability (69/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 607137
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 952
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1963
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 67/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M17 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 39 points higher (87/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (93/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (84/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (69/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M17 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 607137 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 952 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1963 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1100 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 226 g | |
| Price | $130 | $834 |
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy M17 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M17 by 81.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $704. Samsung Galaxy M17 is cheaper by $704.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (93/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (84/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (96/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (81/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (69/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 by 39 points (87/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M17 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.