Samsung Galaxy M17 vs Vivo X300s

The Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $130 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 48/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 607,137); the Samsung Galaxy M17 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 217g).

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 by 41 points (89/100 vs 48/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M17
Performance 47
Display 67
Camera 33
Battery 52
Portability 69
Value for money
Vivo X300s
Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money
What makes Samsung Galaxy M17 better?
  • Lighter: 192g vs 217g
  • Cheaper: $130 vs $723

  • Better portability (69/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 607137
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 952
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1963
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M17 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 41 points higher (89/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (94/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (94/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (69/100 vs 42/100).

Samsung Galaxy M17: The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy M17 Vivo X300s
Processor Samsung Exynos 1330 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 607137 3703823
Geekbench Single 952 3228
Geekbench Multi 1963 9553
Display 6.7" Super AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 2800x1260
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 40W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 50 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 1100 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP54
Dimensions 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm
Weight 192 g 217 g
Price $130 $723
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M17
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera
Vivo X300s
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M17
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
67
display
Vivo X300s
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M17
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless charging: no data
52
battery
Vivo X300s
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy M17 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy M17 Samsung Exynos 1330
48/100
607137 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +83.6%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy M17 by 83.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy M17
$130
Vivo X300s
$723

Price difference: $593. Samsung Galaxy M17 is cheaper by $593.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (94/100 vs 47/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (94/100 vs 67/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (94/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 (83/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (69/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17 by 41 points (89/100 vs 48/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy M17 has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 47/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M17 over the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.