Samsung Galaxy M16 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy M16 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 45/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 524,785); the Samsung Galaxy M16 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy M16
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 191g vs 226g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 67/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M16 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 42 points higher (87/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (84/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (65/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M16 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy M16
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy M16
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M16
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy M16 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M16 by 84.0% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy M16
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (93/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (84/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (96/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (81/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (65/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 by 42 points (87/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M16 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy M16 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M16 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy M16 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.