Samsung Galaxy M16 vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy M16 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 45/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 528,398); the Samsung Galaxy M16 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M16
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy M16 better?
- Lighter: 191g vs 225g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 38/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M16 vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 30 points higher (75/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (95/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (99/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M16 are nearly equal (35/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (80/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (65/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M16 | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 528398 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | — | $548 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M16
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M16
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M16
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M16 and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M16 by 85.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M16
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (95/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (99/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M16 are nearly equal (35/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 (80/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M16 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (65/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M16 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M16 by 30 points (75/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M16 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy M16 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M16 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M16 over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.