Samsung Galaxy M14 4G vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 37/100 (a 54-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 424,216); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G is noticeably lighter (194g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M14 4G
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy M14 4G better?
- Lighter: 194g vs 230g
- Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 424216
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 412
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1423
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 31/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 54 points higher (91/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (99/100 vs 31/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (89/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M14 4G | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 424216 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 412 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1423 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" PLS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, One UI 5.1 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×77.8×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M14 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M14 4G
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M14 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M14 4G and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M14 4G by 90.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M14 4G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (99/100 vs 31/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (89/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (96/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (85/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G by 54 points (91/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy M14 4G has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 31/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.